| Tag | Value |
|---|---|
| file | Inferential_Statistics_vufsw-mediation-1033-en_vufsw-mediation-1033-en |
| name | vufsw-mediation-1033-en |
| section | inferential statistics/regression/multiple linear regression/mediation |
| type | schoice |
| solution | FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE |
| Type | conceptual |
| Program | NA |
| Language | English |
| Level | statistical reasoning |
Which of the following is not one of the disadvantages of Baron and Kenny’s method to assess mediation?
The three disadvantages of the Baron and Kenny method are the following:
Baron and Kenny rely too much on the statistical significance of c and c’. So, if c’=.5 (P=0.049) we conclude that there is mediation while if c’=.5 (P=0.051), we conclude that there is no mediation
Baron and Kenny suggest the testing of the significance of a and b. However, mediation is assessed by the significance of the indirect effect ab which is not the same as testing of the significance of a and b separately.
The condition that a total effect c should exist is not necessary. This is the case in suppression.
Therefore the option “The condition that the indirect effect ab should exist is not necessary” is the correct answer