Tag | Value |
---|---|
file | Inferential_Statistics_vufsw-manova-1067-nl_vufsw-manova-1067-nl |
name | vufsw-manova-1067-nl |
section | inferential statistics/parametric techniques/anova/manova |
type | schoice |
solution | FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE |
Type | conceptual |
Program | NA |
Language | Dutch |
Level | statistical reasoning |
Welke van de volgende 2 stellingen over discriminante analyse als
vervolg op MANOVA is / zijn correct ?
I. Discriminant analyse voorspelt de categorie van experimentele
manipulatie uit de afhankelijke variabelen van MANOVA
II. Met discriminant analyse beslissen we welke van de 4 tests van
MANOVA (Pillai’s trace, Roy’s Largest Root, Wilk’s Lamda en Hotellings
Trace) we moeten gebruiken.
The statement “Discriminant analysis predicts the category of experimental manipulation from the dependent variables of MANOVA” is correct. Discriminant Analysis turns around the situation of MANOVA. The dependent variables of MANOVA are used as predictors in discriminant analysis, while the independent variable of MANOVA (the experimental manipulation) is the dependent variable.
The statement " With discriminant analysis we decide which of the 4 tests of MANOVA (Pillai’s trace, Roy’s Largest Root, Wilk’s Lamda and Hotellings Trace) to use" is incorrect. Discriminant analysis has nothing to do with it.