Exam 1

  1. Metainformation

    Tag Value
    fileInferential_Statistics_vufsw-manova-1040-en_vufsw-manova-1040-en
    namevufsw-manova-1040-en
    sectioninferential statistics/parametric techniques/anova/manova
    typeschoice
    solutionTRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE
    Typeperforming analysis
    ProgramNA
    LanguageEnglish
    Levelstatistical thinking

    Question

    A management consultant was interested in gauging the success of different motivation-enhancing practices on employees. She had two groups of employees who underwent different types of practices: a group team-building exercise and a confidence-building meeting.

    After the motivational practice, participants were asked to endorse eight statements relating to their motivation (on a five-point Likert scale from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree): (1) I live for succeeding in my job,
    (2) I look forward to work when I get up in the morning,
    (3) I do not like missing days through illness,
    (4) I want to work hard to gain a promotion,
    (5) I am going to be more successful this year than last,
    (6) I am in this job to pay the bills,
    (7) People who work harder than me irritate me,
    (8) I often look on the internet for other jobs.

    To ascertain whether the motivational practices had an effect on the responses, the management consultant had to employ a MANOVA with [–I–] dependent variables and a factor with [–II–] categories. Give always a number as a response!


    1. TRUE: I. 8 II. 2
    2. FALSE: I. 2 II. 8
    3. FALSE: I. 7 II. 2
    4. FALSE: I. 2 II. 7

    Solution

    Participants were asked to endorse eight statements relating to their motivation. Therefore, there are 8 dependent variables. There are 2 groups of employees: a group team-building exercise and a confidence-building meeting. Therefore, the factor has 2 categories.


    1. True
    2. False
    3. False
    4. False