| Tag | Value |
|---|---|
| file | Inferential_Statistics_uva-two-sided-hypothesis-93-en_uva-two-sided-hypothesis-93-en |
| name | uva-two-sided-hypothesis-93-en |
| section | Inferential Statistics/NHST/Hypothesis/Two sided hypothesis |
| type | schoice |
| solution | TRUE, FALSE, FALSE |
| Type | Conceptual |
| Language | English |
| Level | Statistical Literacy |
| IRT-Difficulty | 4.276 |
| p-value | 0.0727 |
In a survey with a random sample of 84 people, people were asked whether people agreed with the judge’s ruling in the case of Wilders. In that case, the judge ruled that his film did not incite hatred or violence against Muslims. The percentage of people who agreed with the judge’s ruling was 30%. The researchers wanted to know if the percentage in the population was greater than 25%. To that end the researchers set up a null hypothesis stating that the percentage of people who agree with the judge is 25%. The P-value under this test is