| Tag | Value |
|---|---|
| file | Inferential_Statistics_uva-two-sided-hypothesis-1708-en_uva-two-sided-hypothesis-1708-en |
| name | uva-two-sided-hypothesis-1708-en |
| section | Inferential Statistics/NHST/Hypothesis/Two sided hypothesis |
| type | schoice |
| solution | TRUE, FALSE, FALSE |
| Type | Calculation |
| Language | English |
| Level | Statistical Literacy |
| IRT-Difficulty | 3 |
| p-value | 0.311 |
In a survey with a random sample of 102 people, people were asked whether people agreed with the judge’s ruling in the case of Wilders. In that case, the judge ruled that his film did not incite hatred or violence against Muslims. The percentage of people who agreed with the judge’s ruling was 30%. The researchers wanted to know if the percentage in the population was less than 35%. To that end the researchers set up a null hypothesis stating that the percentage of people who agreed with the judge was 35%. The P-value under this test is